<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for C y b e r L a w  L a t e l y</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberlawlately.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberlawlately.com</link>
	<description>... because other people are serious about blawging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Bits on Email Privacy and Problematic Protect IP Act by PROTECT IP / E-PARASITES Act: Worse to Worser &#171; C y b e r L a w L a t e l y</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/31/quick-bits-on-email-privacy-and-problematic-protect-ip-act/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PROTECT IP / E-PARASITES Act: Worse to Worser &#171; C y b e r L a w L a t e l y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1015#comment-280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] had touched on the Protect IP Act previously, back when it was just awful.   Happy surfing. Share me:FacebookTwitterEmailLike this:LikeBe the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had touched on the Protect IP Act previously, back when it was just awful.   Happy surfing. Share me:FacebookTwitterEmailLike this:LikeBe the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did I Mention How Much I Hate Avvo.com? (or, Avvo Sucks) by T.C. Johnston</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/24/did-i-mention-how-much-i-hate-avvo-com-or-avvo-sucks/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.C. Johnston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=951#comment-241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One:  I couldn&#039;t show any damage.  Two:  I don&#039;t see a cause of action that would pass the laugh test (defamation by algorithm?).  Three:  Lawsuits are a nightmare when you&#039;re a party, and should only be a last resort.  And being annoyed is not a good reason to sue.  Being substantially harmed by someone&#039;s actionable behavior may be, but I have neither of those.  So, I have to be content to vent on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One:  I couldn&#8217;t show any damage.  Two:  I don&#8217;t see a cause of action that would pass the laugh test (defamation by algorithm?).  Three:  Lawsuits are a nightmare when you&#8217;re a party, and should only be a last resort.  And being annoyed is not a good reason to sue.  Being substantially harmed by someone&#8217;s actionable behavior may be, but I have neither of those.  So, I have to be content to vent on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did I Mention How Much I Hate Avvo.com? (or, Avvo Sucks) by Joe Joe</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/24/did-i-mention-how-much-i-hate-avvo-com-or-avvo-sucks/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=951#comment-239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why haven&#039;t you sued AVVO?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why haven&#8217;t you sued AVVO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Few Nasty Words about Copyright Trolls and Shakedown Lawyers by Another Ouch for Righthaven &#8211; Republishing Entire Article is Fair Use &#8230; And More Fun! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/03/26/copyright-trolls-shakedown-lawyers/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Ouch for Righthaven &#8211; Republishing Entire Article is Fair Use &#8230; And More Fun! &#171; CyberLaw Lately]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=637#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] law, which keeps not quite like Twinkies, but &#8230; nevermind.  More on Copyright Trolls as I ranted about, and took quiet joy at the exposure of their sham assignments, and now more nail-in-the-coffiny [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law, which keeps not quite like Twinkies, but &#8230; nevermind.  More on Copyright Trolls as I ranted about, and took quiet joy at the exposure of their sham assignments, and now more nail-in-the-coffiny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Righthaven Wrong &#8211; Copyright Troll Eats Mud with Bogus Assignment by Another Ouch for Righthaven &#8211; Republishing Entire Article is Fair Use &#8230; And More Fun! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/20/righthaven-wrong-copyright-troll-eats-mud-with-bogus-assignment/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Ouch for Righthaven &#8211; Republishing Entire Article is Fair Use &#8230; And More Fun! &#171; CyberLaw Lately]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=912#comment-207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  More on Copyright Trolls as I ranted about, and took quiet joy at the exposure of their sham assignments, and now more nail-in-the-coffiny stuff for Righthaven, the trolls who snag bloggers who republish [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  More on Copyright Trolls as I ranted about, and took quiet joy at the exposure of their sham assignments, and now more nail-in-the-coffiny stuff for Righthaven, the trolls who snag bloggers who republish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Few Nasty Words about Copyright Trolls and Shakedown Lawyers by Kent Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/03/26/copyright-trolls-shakedown-lawyers/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=637#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a shakedown letter from an attorney in New York. I submitted a press release. I&#039;ve talked to him and he threatened a lawsuit but so far nothing. I understand there is a group trying to file a class action suit against the instigator of this shakedown, but I don&#039;t know for sure. See my press release at http://www.prlog.org/10815914-3m-attorney-attempts-shake-down-of-small-web-retailer.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a shakedown letter from an attorney in New York. I submitted a press release. I&#8217;ve talked to him and he threatened a lawsuit but so far nothing. I understand there is a group trying to file a class action suit against the instigator of this shakedown, but I don&#8217;t know for sure. See my press release at <a href="http://www.prlog.org/10815914-3m-attorney-attempts-shake-down-of-small-web-retailer.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.prlog.org/10815914-3m-attorney-attempts-shake-down-of-small-web-retailer.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Wanna Chuck Your Cell Phone in the Bay in Protest? Sue AT&amp;T for Taxing your Internet! by U.S. Supremes Rip Class Actions a new Mass-Hole &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2010/01/23/att-internet-tax/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Supremes Rip Class Actions a new Mass-Hole &#171; CyberLaw Lately]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=289#comment-197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in to my post over a year ago from a guy in Chicago who was going to sue AT&amp;T for (allegedly) illegally [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in to my post over a year ago from a guy in Chicago who was going to sue AT&amp;T for (allegedly) illegally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zediva = Oops? Nah, Expected&#8230; by OK, Maybe This Massive Array of Tiny Antennas Will Skirt that Pesky Copyright Law&#8230; &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/12/zediva-oops-nah-expected/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OK, Maybe This Massive Array of Tiny Antennas Will Skirt that Pesky Copyright Law&#8230; &#171; CyberLaw Lately]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=806#comment-190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you videos remotely (their disc and machine; you play them from home), and the unsurprisingly quick lawsuit in response.  We turn now to a beta test in NYC &#8230; called [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you videos remotely (their disc and machine; you play them from home), and the unsurprisingly quick lawsuit in response.  We turn now to a beta test in NYC &#8230; called [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zediva&#8217;s Movie Streaming Copyright Workaround Isn&#8217;t a Loophole &#8230; Technically by OK, Maybe This Massive Array of Tiny Antennas Will Skirt that Pesky Copyright Law&#8230; &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/03/21/zediva-loophole/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OK, Maybe This Massive Array of Tiny Antennas Will Skirt that Pesky Copyright Law&#8230; &#171; CyberLaw Lately]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=730#comment-189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] tie-in to the whole Zediva bit, where they rent you videos remotely (their disc and machine; you play them from home), and the unsurprisingly quick lawsuit in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tie-in to the whole Zediva bit, where they rent you videos remotely (their disc and machine; you play them from home), and the unsurprisingly quick lawsuit in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Righthaven Wrong &#8211; Copyright Troll Eats Mud with Bogus Assignment by Righthaven Wrong ? Copyright Troll Eats Mud with Bogus Assignment &#8230; &#124; Hilarious Random Pictures</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/20/righthaven-wrong-copyright-troll-eats-mud-with-bogus-assignment/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Righthaven Wrong ? Copyright Troll Eats Mud with Bogus Assignment &#8230; &#124; Hilarious Random Pictures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=912#comment-185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/20/righthaven-wrong-copyright-troll-eats-mud-with-bogus-assignment... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/20/righthaven-wrong-copyright-troll-eats-mud-with-bogus-assignment" rel="nofollow">http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/20/righthaven-wrong-copyright-troll-eats-mud-with-bogus-assignment</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

