<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CyberLaw Lately</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberlawlately.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberlawlately.com</link>
	<description>What&#039;s been going on in Internet Law ... lately.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I Should Have Sexted that Minor Rather Than Sent a Letter? by Guilty or Not Guilty: The New Facebook In-Trial Juror Poll &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2010/02/12/ok-to-sext-minors-in-mass/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Guilty or Not Guilty: The New Facebook In-Trial Juror Poll &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=387#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. Judicial Conference by T.C. Johnston   In the not-at-all-similar vein of my last post 2/12/10 regarding inclusiveness in language, I now find myself continuing in a downward spiral toward [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. Judicial Conference by T.C. Johnston   In the not-at-all-similar vein of my last post 2/12/10 regarding inclusiveness in language, I now find myself continuing in a downward spiral toward [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by Ahh, but the US Govt is an Equal Opportunity Illegal Eavesdropper . . . &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahh, but the US Govt is an Equal Opportunity Illegal Eavesdropper . . . &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] where am I gonna find a pay phone to try to avoid the eavesdropping?  It&#8217;s the decas!  I&#8217;ve got to keep on top of my smuggling operation bringing Coca-Cola in glass bottles and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where am I gonna find a pay phone to try to avoid the eavesdropping?  It&#8217;s the decas!  I&#8217;ve got to keep on top of my smuggling operation bringing Coca-Cola in glass bottles and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by Don&#8217;t Wanna Chuck Your Cell Phone in the Bay in Protest? Sue AT&#38;T for Taxing your Internet! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Wanna Chuck Your Cell Phone in the Bay in Protest? Sue AT&#38;T for Taxing your Internet! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] BlitzBlurb:  Internet service not-taxable per the TFA &#8217;til 2014; AT&amp;T taxes Internet access; well, it depends on how you define Internet access; clear as mud; let&#8217;s sue to find out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlitzBlurb:  Internet service not-taxable per the TFA &#8217;til 2014; AT&amp;T taxes Internet access; well, it depends on how you define Internet access; clear as mud; let&#8217;s sue to find out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by Hey, BitTorrenters are People Too! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey, BitTorrenters are People Too! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] unfettered Internet access to users.   Seems that wasn&#8217;t helping their defense against the class-actioneers.   So Comcast settled the class action — to pay up to $16 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unfettered Internet access to users.   Seems that wasn&#8217;t helping their defense against the class-actioneers.   So Comcast settled the class action — to pay up to $16 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by We Have Water, You Have a Server Farm — Let’s Get Together « CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>We Have Water, You Have a Server Farm — Let’s Get Together « CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Google brings in money and jobs.  That seems cool too, although I won&#8217;t venture whether the Milwaukonomy would actually benefit from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google brings in money and jobs.  That seems cool too, although I won&#8217;t venture whether the Milwaukonomy would actually benefit from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by Microsoft Continues to be EU’s Punching Bag « CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Continues to be EU’s Punching Bag « CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Commission&#8217;s investigation — offspring of the antitrust wars with Microsoft in the early aughts — that this time focused on the bundling of Internet Explorer (IE) with Microsoft&#8217;s Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commission&#8217;s investigation — offspring of the antitrust wars with Microsoft in the early aughts — that this time focused on the bundling of Internet Explorer (IE) with Microsoft&#8217;s Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glossary of CyberLawLatelyisms by Make Money Stuffing Virtual Envelopes! (Google Don&#8217;t Think So) &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/about/glossary-of-cyberlawlatelyisms/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Stuffing Virtual Envelopes! (Google Don&#8217;t Think So) &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?page_id=198#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] the decas. Now it&#8217;s spam that says you can work for Google at home. The &#8220;kit&#8221; this time is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the decas. Now it&#8217;s spam that says you can work for Google at home. The &#8220;kit&#8221; this time is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, BitTorrenters are People Too! by FCC Moves Toward Net Neutrality Rules &#8211; PC World &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2009/12/29/comcast-data-discrimination/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Moves Toward Net Neutrality Rules &#8211; PC World &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=148#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] ↓ (Down there) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ↓ (Down there) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Can&#8217;t Believe I Eat That Much! (Data, that is.) by Hey, BitTorrenters are People Too! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2009/12/12/i-cant-believe-i-eat-that-much-data-that-is/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey, BitTorrenters are People Too! &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=55#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] really taken hold &#8230; yet.  They&#8217;re both about volume.  (Hey, this ties into my 12/12 post about the massive amounts of data we consume daily and ways to data diet.)  But who&#8217;s to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really taken hold &#8230; yet.  They&#8217;re both about volume.  (Hey, this ties into my 12/12 post about the massive amounts of data we consume daily and ways to data diet.)  But who&#8217;s to say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Enhances Privacy Policy &#8230; or not by Now Facebook Wants You to Lie to Maintain Your Privacy? Well, Not Really &#8230; Kind Of &#171; CyberLaw Lately</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2009/12/11/facebook-enhances-privacy-or-not/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Now Facebook Wants You to Lie to Maintain Your Privacy? Well, Not Really &#8230; Kind Of &#171; CyberLaw Lately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=23#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] December 16    by T.C. Johnston   Rolling along with the Facebook Privacy Brouhaha mentioned here 12/11, The Washington Post points to some sloppy language (by Facebook or The Wall Street Journal) that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 16    by T.C. Johnston   Rolling along with the Facebook Privacy Brouhaha mentioned here 12/11, The Washington Post points to some sloppy language (by Facebook or The Wall Street Journal) that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
