<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C y b e r L a w  L a t e l y</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberlawlately.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberlawlately.com</link>
	<description>... because other people are serious about blawging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='cyberlawlately.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://cyberlawlately.com/osd.xml" title="C y b e r L a w  L a t e l y" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cyberlawlately.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Nice, a SOPA-Site Detecting Chrome Extension</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2012/01/08/nice-a-sopa-site-detecting-chrome-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2012/01/08/nice-a-sopa-site-detecting-chrome-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you know what that means, go to the Chrome Store.   Otherwise, here&#8217;s Forbes on it: Chrome Add-on Tells You When You&#8217;re Browsing A Site That Supports SOPA &#8211; Forbes. In case that story locks up on you,  here&#8217;s another version from ReadWriteWeb.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1091&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2012/01/08/nice-a-sopa-site-detecting-chrome-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitler Reacts to SOPA</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/12/27/hitler-reacts-to-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/12/27/hitler-reacts-to-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Hertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect IP Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.wordpress.com/?p=1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a primer of sorts about SOPA, with yet another parody using the oft-trolled Hitler clips from &#8220;Downfall&#8221; – this time with SOPA as subject.   Mostly spot on, and very funny. I&#8217;ve got plenty to say about this (like the irony of the &#8220;Downfall&#8221; clip being used in  this context), but I&#8217;m on holiday, so [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1085&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/12/27/hitler-reacts-to-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PROTECT IP / E-PARASITES Act: Worse to Worser</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/10/27/protect-ip-e-parasites-act-worse-to-worser/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/10/27/protect-ip-e-parasites-act-worse-to-worser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect IP Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just dropping some links to important stuff, first from Mike Masnick @ TechDirt, who tells it not-like-a-lawyer: PROTECT IP Renamed E-PARASITES Act; Would Create The Great Firewall Of America &#124; Techdirt.  In sum, the House version broadens the bad.  Says Masnick: The bill would require service providers to block access to certain websites, very much contrary [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1072&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/10/27/protect-ip-e-parasites-act-worse-to-worser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://cyberlawlately.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/copyright_bomb.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">copyright_bomb</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga Loses Domain Claim for LadyGaga.org (with a Doh!)</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/09/23/lady-gaga-loses-domain-claim-for-ladygaga-org-with-a-doh/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/09/23/lady-gaga-loses-domain-claim-for-ladygaga-org-with-a-doh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LadyGaga.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning my inbox coughed up the most recent spate of UDRP decisions from the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) – the body that decides a big chunk of the domain name arbitrations in &#8230; er, the world.   Breezing through usual types of decisions (e.g., folks registering a variation of known commercial trademarks to create ad-squatting [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1050&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/09/23/lady-gaga-loses-domain-claim-for-ladygaga-org-with-a-doh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ v. Facebook &#8211; Why can&#8217;t we just get along?</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/07/17/google-v-facebook-why-cant-we-just-get-along/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/07/17/google-v-facebook-why-cant-we-just-get-along/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got your Google+ invite yet? I got one, but who has the time?  Looks promising enough &#8230; but, I guess Buzz did too, and I was the only one I know who spent any time on Wave (er, nonproductive time). Anyway, interesting piece in TechCrunch by Tom Anderson (yes, the MySpace guy who left messages [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1035&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/07/17/google-v-facebook-why-cant-we-just-get-along/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/tom-anderson1.jpg?w=0" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Bits on Email Privacy and Problematic Protect IP Act</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/31/quick-bits-on-email-privacy-and-problematic-protect-ip-act/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/31/quick-bits-on-email-privacy-and-problematic-protect-ip-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect IP Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple quickies from the they-say-what-they-need-to-so-why-should-I-say-it-again department. First we have Wired with Internet Researchers Decry DNS-Filtering Legislation &#124; Threat Level &#124; Wired.com.   Some technical mumbo jumbo that says one measure of the Protect IP Act (currently stalled in the Senate) would basically allow the feds to order ISPs to send a domain name somewhere other [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=1015&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/31/quick-bits-on-email-privacy-and-problematic-protect-ip-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5096/5415721674_2a49bb42f9.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Homeland Security&#039;s Real Message</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Ouch for Righthaven &#8211; Republishing Entire Article is Fair Use &#8230; And More Fun!</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/12/another-ouch-for-righthaven-republishing-entire-article-is-fair-use-and-more-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/12/another-ouch-for-righthaven-republishing-entire-article-is-fair-use-and-more-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BitTorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righthaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shakedown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#8217;t quite as fresh as I&#8217;d like, but then it&#8217;s law, which keeps not quite like Twinkies, but &#8230; nevermind.  More on Copyright Trolls as I ranted about, and took quiet joy at the exposure of their sham assignments, and now more nail-in-the-coffiny stuff for Righthaven, the trolls who snag bloggers who republish stuff [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=958&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/05/12/another-ouch-for-righthaven-republishing-entire-article-is-fair-use-and-more-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supremes Rip Class Actions a New Mass-Hole</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/28/u-s-supremes-rip-class-actions-a-new-mass-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/28/u-s-supremes-rip-class-actions-a-new-mass-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Hertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tied in to my post over a year ago about a guy in Chicago who was going to sue AT&#38;T for (allegedly) illegally taxing his Internet access, now we move to California, where a couple brought a class action over that type of issue. Goes to the U.S. Supreme Court – yes, that one, so recently [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=977&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/28/u-s-supremes-rip-class-actions-a-new-mass-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2266/2247705686_1b028f6edf_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">AT&#38;T Logo Parody (white background)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did I Mention How Much I Hate Avvo.com? (or, Avvo Sucks)</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/24/did-i-mention-how-much-i-hate-avvo-com-or-avvo-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/24/did-i-mention-how-much-i-hate-avvo-com-or-avvo-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Hertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avvo sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avvo.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avvo.com (no, the rat-bastards* don&#8217;t get a link-through from me) is this website ostensibly set up to help the public sort through lawyers with this allegedly neutral ranking.  They use this three-criteria system (1-5 dots each) to arrive at a rating from 1-10: Experience, Industry Recognition, Professional Conduct. I suppose it might not be a bad [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=951&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/24/did-i-mention-how-much-i-hate-avvo-com-or-avvo-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.avvo.com/avvo/cms/greencheck_email.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://media.avvo.com/avvo/cms/greencheck_email.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://media.avvo.com/avvo/cms/greencheck_email.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://media.avvo.com/avvo/cms/greencheck_email.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK, Maybe This Massive Array of Tiny Antennas Will Skirt that Pesky Copyright Law&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/22/ok-maybe-this-massive-array-of-tiny-antennas-will-skirt-that-pesky-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/22/ok-maybe-this-massive-array-of-tiny-antennas-will-skirt-that-pesky-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.C. Johnston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bamboom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiny antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zediva]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawlately.com/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice tie-in to the whole Zediva bit, where they rent you videos remotely (their disc and machine; you play them from home), and the unsurprisingly quick lawsuit in response.  We turn now to a beta test in NYC &#8230; called Bamboom. In this case, it&#8217;s a little more complicated, but still requiring an inordinate amount of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cyberlawlately.com&#038;blog=10917271&#038;post=919&#038;subd=cyberlawlately&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlawlately.com/2011/04/22/ok-maybe-this-massive-array-of-tiny-antennas-will-skirt-that-pesky-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bdb654d7e2fafaa6b6df9727ccc84f80?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tcjohnston</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3071/2825160347_8de7290e92.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Clouded</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
